step one. Yet, inside genealogy, we knowthat for every single signal discover an exclusion. A good vexing section ofgenealogy is that no body very knows how to utilize the fresh new conditions orrules with any decisive adjective for example constantly, maybe, probably,probably, etc. It could be fascinating in the event the truth be told there almost every other advice ofjointures getting produced a-year or several immediately following a known relationship day.
dos. Could there be a keen extant dispensation for the relationships out-of ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, after taken off the latest fifth LordClifford? Who does narrow down the matrimony time.
Arthur
Allegedly, if a good dispensation try looked for and you will provided, it might havebeen from the one of many adopting the, and may even appear in the correspondingregister guide, whether it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. When your 10th Lord Clifford really does marry during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Age after because season, really does the new chronology perhaps not functions?
John possession?
E born into the later 1487, Henry produced in 1488/9, Joan for the ,etcetera. completing brand new names of one’s upload out-of . In the event that (a) thechronology still performs; and you will (b) their unique marriage portion wasn’t reasonable; thenwe just have the new 1505 pedigree regarding Henry VII’s that is inside oppositionto the latest conjecture that she are a legitimate daughter.
six. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: Certainly are the Clifford daughters the latest onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Are there anyone else? Therefore,won’t one mirror defectively with this document because the a source?
From evaluations You will find made of new c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your own North pedigrees, which can be
In the c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, the newest Clifford children are perhaps not listedin a Clifford pedigree, but rather in the St. John pedigree. Because the I’mnot familiar with the newest St. John household members, pursuing the ‘s the information asit seems in the c.1505 pedigree, once the obtained from the 1834 Coll. Better. etGen. blog post. The fresh new phrasing in the quotations is strictly because it seems inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Out-of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset had around three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman the fresh new King’s Mother.” who had “The fresh new King.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic husband.” she got step 3 daus & dos sons:
A good. “Edith, married to help you Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded on Woman Margaret, dau. from theDuke out-of Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously five people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young buck and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, wedded to Thomas Kent, Esq. away from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun off Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond https://kissbrides.com/hr/blog/indijske-stranice-i-aplikacije-za-upoznavanje/ Frognall and his brethren and you will sistren.” Having issueindicated, although not entitled.C2. “E, married in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Elizabeth, married first to the Lord Zouche; just after toward LordScrope out of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Elizabeth. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” That have issueindicated not titled.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Age.”
